After the election 4 years ago, I wrote it was all over. Nothing has really changed that opinion. First we have Hillary, who is sort of like Obama, except that she has lived the political world longer than Obama has been alive. Winning with less than 50% of the popular vote (a distinct possibility) would not make her moderate her administration. Instead, it would encourage her to hit the gas pedal in case the Republicans get more or Congress, or get it back in 2018.
Hey, who’s kidding? This is about Donald Trump. Had the Democrats had control of the nomination process, they might have tried to get someone slightly more marketable than Hillary Clinton. Given her tendency to annoy everyone and the glaring failures and flexible ethics displayed by her and her family, a change should have been in order.
Instead, we have Trump. I’m not sure if the worst part for me is that he’s showing all the symptoms of a loser or that he’s nothing like the Republican president that I want. I suppose both are connected. On fear alone, I want Trump to win over Hillary. In the long-term, the GOP seems to put on their big boy pants best after a crushing loss, and that coupled with Trump exiting the stage, might spell grudging reform in the party.
Depending on where you look, Trump can win if he manages to swing +5% in polls with a margin of error of about 4%. No matter what pundits say, margin of error is not only real, but probably bigger than the statistically calculated sigma based on number of respondents. Still, the Brexit theory would have to hold up. Trump voters, not just supporters, have to be silent, but motivated. Clinton spent a lot of money to get early voting and registration up. Trump has sheer force of will.
There are mostly cons to any outcome of this election, except for a possible tie-breaker in the House of Representatives where Evan McMullin wins because he got 6 Electoral Votes in Utah. Otherwise, I remain indifferent.
Donald Trump cemented himself as a political force when he decided to refuse all immigration reform and proposed a big ass wall that would stop immigration by strolling over the border. It was the triumph of rhetoric over policy. Soon America would be great, Ward could find a job (whatever it was) and June could stay home in her house dress and pearls.
Politics is downstream from culture, but politics cannot be influenced by a cultural figure alone. Donald Trump and Barack Obama are only slightly different. Trump was a flamboyant figure to whom the media was attracted. Obama was a boring ideologue who was styled by the media as an icon of modern politics. In short, Trump is a self-made media figure, but a media figure nonetheless. Obama said he would heal the oceans and bring back America’s place in the world. Trump promises to make America Great again.
A conservative, pro-America message can go a long way. Running not only to the right, but to the fringe can be highly successful in the Republican primaries. The problem is that instead of a real candidate, we have Trump. A real candidate was like George W. Bush. He ran on conservative values, but also ran on his ability to bring both parties together back in Texas. A fake candidate says everyone who doesn’t agree with him is an enemy and the enemy deserves no mercy.
The problem is that Trump has no idea what he believes. He mostly wants to one-up the person he’s going against. I truly wonder why his supporters are so devoted to him. Only a few million people were watching The Apprentice the last time NBC decided to produce it. Were they impressed by Trump’s ability to cut people off mid-sentence and eventually get a paycheck for two of his kids as well?
Donald Trump has taken a valid theory, that of a candidate willing to fight the liberal media and speak plainly about where America should be, and extracted all the professional political work that could be employed in that pursuit. Then, he managed to make people think that lack of professionalism is a virtue.
Culture must come first. Trump was a liberal cultural figure and he is only a few years removed from being a Democrat and a Hillary supporter. Conservatives need to make their own fledgling and separate media into a cultural force. We would have been better off with Dean Cain or Kevin Sorbo running for president. At least they’ve believed in something for more than 6 years.
One of the meanings behind ABC in the 90’s was “Anybody But Clinton.” Basically, Clinton was so bad, anyone was better. Back in 1994, Bob Dole was running 60 / 40 ahead of Bill Clinton. Of course, Clinton made it all the way to 49% in 1996 and Dole was in the low 40s because of Ross Perot.
So the threats of apocalyptic disaster should Hillary Clinton win is some old news. I chose not to be ruled by that kind of fear, especially when the mongers are the same people who threatened to vote for Trump on a third-party ticket if he didn’t win the Republican nomination.
This isn’t Brexit. There is no groundswell of CHUDs waiting to climb to the surface and vote for Trump. The Democrats saw this coming and prepared. They’re already airing ads (which amusingly conflate a physical disability with a developmental one) targeted toward Republican women.
Gee, if only there was a GOP candidate who used big data and was an expert debater.
Richard Nixon was probably the last Republican to use his Republican credentials to successfully run a presidential campaign. Reagan ran against Nixon in the 1968 primaries and had to run against Gerald Ford twice. George W. Bush was an outsider, a Texas governor who wasn’t expected to be the nominee. No one wants to be part of the system, and nearly all of them are.
Donald Trump is certainly not a GOP insider. He’s changed parties five times and ran for the Reform Party nomination in 2000. In a weird way, however, he represents the GOP better than anyone. He’s their spirit animal. Trump and the GOP are so afraid of losing that they will give up long term gains to prevent short term and temporary losses. Every time Trump tried to moderate his position, he lost the adoration of the tiny fraction of the voting population who go to his rallies or forward racist Twitter memes to him.
Since the 2004 election, Republicans have had two good runs. In 2014, the GOP learned to coordinate their efforts with establishment Congressional candidates, but also to work with Tea Party candidates who found success, like Joni Ernst. However, 2010 may have been the most important lesson. That lesson wasn’t to listen to Glenn Beck or run against Obamacare. It was to put yourself in front of the voters with the full knowledge that you could either win or lose.
One reason why Republican candidates did so well in 2010 is that Tea Party supporters ran in races where other Republicans did not dare to run. Too many House races (and some Senate races) are uncontested, mostly because potential candidates fear the consequences of failure. Hopefully, even if Hillary Clinton is elected president, Republicans won’t lose their House and Senate majorities.
The Republican Party does its best work at the state and local level, winning races for Congress and governor, especially since most states are Republican, even if they have lower populations. Since population density pretty much determines party affiliation, Republicans need to make their stand in low-density states. In many countries, there isn’t even a president. The legislative majority chooses the leader. In the United States, the Congress theoretically controls important decisions.
This year may be the first where ticket splitting (in this case, voters choosing a Democrat for president and Republicans for other elected offices) has a significant impact on the federal government. If that is the case, the GOP needs to learn that winning the presidency is not the brass ring, especially if they exercise the power of Congress.
It took about 2 minutes for me to know what the debate was about, after the debate was over. Donald Trump was pressed on the question of whether he would accept the results of an election where he lost. Despite all the cries about a constitutional crisis, this is old news.
Remember, the GOP was very worried about a populist Trump candidacy destroying the Republicans’ chances. The pledge was created, and Trump swore to it… during most of the primary campaign.Everyone but maybe Jeb and John Kasich eventually supported Trump as the nominee. The pledge, of course, was an attempt to give the GOP cover if Trump did run as a third party or told his minions to stay home.
The problem is that Trump saw the opportunity to drum up excitement with his base by basically refusing a new pledge to accept the results of the national election. Why should he? In fact, there was no real reason to accept the Republican pledge, except as a way to help a campaign that was briefly beaten by Ted Cruz. Being a man who stands alone worked with Republican primary voters. I wonder how dumb the rest of the population is.
If the cote total in the election is about the same as in 2012, 120 million or more people will cast a ballot. Between the Republicans and the Democrats, just over 60 million people voted for a candidate. Less than half voted for the eventual nominee of their party. The point is that by November 9, only 13% of the people who voted in the general election will have voted for the winner in the primaries as well.
The 44% of Republican primary voters who chose Trump are not even as excited as they were 6 months ago. I have to assume the Hillary supporters are delusional, as the disturbing information about her campaign and tenure at State have had no impact on her “popularity.”
I was actually pretty happy to vote for Romney and McCain, once he added Sarah Palin to the ticket. Most of that was due to how much I despised the Democrats and their crap. Now that Trump is giving as dirty as he’s getting, I find myself kind of indifferent. I don’t care to reward the Republicans or Trump with my vote this year. Instead, I’m giving the Libertarian Party a chance, despite Gary Johnson’s obvious inability to use the media.
I think most Americans are just becoming resigned to their choice, whichever that may be. Usually, they would have accepted their decision by now, but it’s hard to accept the reality that America’s two choices are two egomaniacs who either don’t have the temperament or morals (or either) for the job. My only consolation is that for one group of die hards, their dream dies in 3 weeks and for the other group, their dream dies more slowly over a matter of months.
One of the many ironies of this election is that the media propped up the Trump campaign and was lured by ratings to interview him as much as he’d appear. Now, they’ve decided that Trump is not their guy for president and Hillary Clinton is the closest thing to Bernie Sanders they’re going to get. The inevitable turn has happened, yet again. One of the early lines of attack (remember the rape stories the first month of the campaign?) was resurrected.
The minor difference this year is that Trump supporters seemed to think that he was using the media. He got his free air time and brought up all the protectionist stuff his opponents wouldn’t and made the networks cover a hotel opening instead of birther remarks. Of course, McCain thought the media liked him because he was a maverick.
The Republicans are in desperate need of a media strategy. People seem to think that the Democrats are simply the media’s choice. No, the Democrats reinvented themselves into a party that said the stuff the media agrees with. Look at something like gay marriage. That is the culmination of decades of pandering to gays, who found themselves gravitating toward entertainment and media. How about abortion, the solution for young starlets who got themselves in trouble before the universality of birth control.
Trump’s mistake is that he hitched his wagon to a group that had beliefs. He thought all he had to do was talk about the old days and blame everything on foreign immigrants and hostile foreigners. The problem is that many of the people who believe in things know that Trump does not. Worse yet, the media now realizes Trump is not one of them anymore.
Now, Trump is back to his core beliefs, that he is a god among men and only cheating and duplicity can (temporarily) bring him down. The media is watching the fall, because even if Trump has no chance, it’s getting ratings.
After the Perot bubble from 1992-1996, presidential polls have been maddeningly close. In 2000, people thought there may be an Electoral College crisis, but one where Bush would get the majority vote and Gore would take the Electoral College. 2016 is not so much close, but a victim of the margin of error.
A wired “landline” phone is demographically skewed toward the elderly or middle aged people set in their ways. Cell phone users don’t want to get polling calls when they are about their business. Internet polls tend to bring out people with a vested interest. The LA Times has tried something different, using a large cohort of people and sub-sampling them on a regular basis. Those polls are pretty favorable to Donald Trump.
The polls people hate the most are the ones that counter their own interests. There’s also a psychological aspect to polling where the observer effect influences the outcome of an election. Predictions of Gore winning before most states closed their polls may have reduced Bush’s overall vote and made him the popular vote loser. The Clinton campaign has made full use of data mining, defining each American adult to a score of how easy it is to get them to press the button for Hillary.
I’m all for a set of randomness in the electoral process. If Donald Trump wins, that’s not what will happen. Remember, in 2008, big data was inaccurate at best. A lot of the Obama campaign was selling Barack Obama as an idea. He was the guy who would bring both sides together. He was cool and calm and didn’t inflame passions, except for those who wanted to vote for him. The media created that narrative because McCain was more qualified and an outsider was the best sales job available.
In the case of Trump, the metrics that defined him were buzz, Twitter mentions and free air time. If that becomes the new model, loudmouths will be the standard bearers of democracy. Donald can run with the likes of Hoard Stern (who briefly ran for governor of New York) or the late Morton Downey Jr.All in all, I’d rather have the polls.
If you know others and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know others but know yourself, you win one and lose one; if you do not know others and do not know yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.
-Some illegal Chinese guy
To the surprise of no one, Donald Trump refused to let Republican campaign staff do opposition research on himself after he had the nomination. I’m sure his opponents tried but failed to find anything that wasn’t already well-known and disqualifying. The media, however, had a much easier time because much of it was in the media (Apprentice contestants, Miss USA contestants, Access Hollywood videos) and waiting for October.
Donald Trump operates in lizard brain territory, so why he has support has little to do with what he says, but how it resonates with the consistent level of support he’s had for at least a year. One thing most conservatives can agree on is that the media is 1)made up of Democrat-leaning people and 2)willing to produce content intended to uphold their political beliefs and tear down the ones they oppose. Trump’s utter contempt for the media has never wavered. He went on show after show, most of the time leaving the victor. The media likes Republican primary candidates. They hate Republican Party nominees.
If you don’t know the enemy or yourself, you are doomed to failure. Given that candidates like John Kerry, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton can be competitive, it’s not these idiots and their non-existent charisma that is endangering the Republicans, it’s the media’s enabling of them. Julian Assange can violate John Podesta’s e-mails all he wants. They don’t exist in the news because a new woman makes a charge against Trump every night, and Trump disparages their looks and importance every afternoon.
Today, I’m mostly dealing with strategy. The reason Trump was doomed to fail is because he’s Donald Trump. The particular method of destruction was increased by lack of vetting of Trump himself by whatever campaign staff is left and no real plan to fight the media, which is a hallmark of Republicans for the last couple of decades. Fox News was a nice try, but it will never be the same after 2016.
Journalist Tucker Carlson tells the story of a phone call he got from Donald Trump in the early 2000’s at a point where he was dating his current wife Melania. In response to a Tucker Carlson remark about Trump’s hair, he heard this gem.
“It’s true you have better hair than I do,” Trump said matter-of-factly. “But I get more pussy than you do.”
We have apparently degraded as a country to a point where the grabbing is the issue rather than the getting. Trump’s affairs are well-known and are essentially baked into the cake. He was perfectly willing to level the playing field when a tabloid story appeared about opponent Ted Cruz and a story about alleged affairs.
I have no idea whether or not the cover story about Ted Cruz in this week’s issue of the National Enquirer is true or not, but I had absolutely nothing to do with it, did not know about it, and have not, as yet, read it.
“Likewise, I have nothing to do with the National Enquirer and unlike Lyin’ Ted Cruz I do not surround myself with political hacks and henchman and then pretend total innocence. Ted Cruz’s problem with the National Enquirer is his and his alone, and while they were right about O.J. Simpson, John Edwards, and many others, I certainly hope they are not right about Lyin’ Ted Cruz.”
Now, the New York Times and CNN don’t have the journalistic gravitas of the National Enquirer, which was right about John Edwards’ affair, but multiple women have come forward on their own to tell stories of groping, kissing, pinning and barging in to changing rooms with underage beauty contestants. Unlike Trump, I don’t surround myself with sexual harassers, bigots and possible mistresses of Ted Cruz. Still, Trump could be completely innocent of one thing out of the dozens of things he should be ashamed of.