If there was any lingering doubt that Obama will do whatever the hell he wants, flaunt it, and then dare the other side to stop him, last week’s “executive action” was it.
The ball is in the GOP’s court now. They promised not to block a budget, but then again, Obama promised not to use executive action to change immigration police. Plus, there’s that whole keeping your health care thing. The Republicans have the options they have. They can use them or Obama can be a monarch. He has no better nature to appeal to.
A man named Herbert Marshall McLuhan first coined the concept that the “medium is the message.” He also introduced the term “global village,” something that is used to describe the internet, which McLuhan also predicted. Many of these observations were made in the 1960′s. McLuhan died in 1980.
The basic concept of the medium as message is that the way one gets their information affects the way a person retains it, interprets it and disseminates it. The game of “Telephone” is an example of how oral tradition can work (or not) as a story is passed on by speaking it, hearing it, trying to remember it, and retelling it in your own words. The printed word is different. As books became more common, people didn’t have to remember every word they saw. They had to process more words by looking at them, but had the original source available to them.
Movies and television made media more entertainment than information. radio is often fractured into both. Stations are either music or talk, with little crossover. Now, we’ve had almost a generation on the Internet. It has absorbed every type of media that came before it. Websites are read, podcasts are listed to. Every type of media can be experienced or obtained through the global network. The ownership of individual media (books, movies) is becoming a thing of the past. Even information is something to be extracted, not learned.
Much was made of the Obama campaign’s presence in new media. The story was that his people were young and hip. They knew how to use blogs and social media. They sent alerts by e-mail and clogged up e-mails with spam. That was the story, but the true exploitation of new media was in the way traditional media was bought and controlled by those who wanted to create their own political outcome.
Even before McLuhan, George Orwell was writing about people in the future who would rewrite history as the leadership demanded. The Internet is the medium that makes this most possible. Except for a few screen grabs, everything online is in a state of flux. If a media organisation wants to change or “clarify” their content, most people won’t have any idea what changed.
The old media has shown themselves to be partners to Obama. NBC has massive financial connections with GE tax breaks. ABC had a reporter, Jay Carney, who covered the 2008 campaign and then start working for the White House after the election. His wife still works in news. CBS did not treat Obama the way they treated Bush (the National Guard Memo vs. Obama’s dubious Selective Service non-compliance) and went on to shaft Sharyl Attkisson when she tried to actually report the news.
This may be their last chance at a power grab. With near constant access to the Internet with smart phones and other devices, we will all be the next medium. The social network at large will inform us. We will learn to separate good information from bad, the way we should have decades ago from the dinosaur media. Until then, the media sends a message by cutting the telephone wires as well as using them.
If you look at Western civilization, which is the forerunner of all civilization, popular rule and democracy has been a long but steady road over centuries. Self-determination is one of the last steps to human fulfillment, after survival, security and the chance for social advancement. In essence, people got tired of one person telling them what to do.
People crave a voice under a particular set of circumstances. They need to be relatively secure, but face hardships that center on one unreasonable person in power. Add some leadership and you have a revolution on your hands. Those revolutions have often been long and bloody, but the modern world was left with governments where citizens choose the lawmakers and the “leader” can be simply voted out of their position.
The last century or so has seen much of the world in a post-democracy phase. People can choose the ones in charge, but their choices and votes have been influenced more and more by those with a hand in the government coffers. Simple graft, however, is easy to catch. Now, we face the fact that more and more money is going to pay off constituencies and the real profit comes to those who know how to distribute money to interest groups.
America is in pretty good shape. We have a good economy. People have jobs and places to live. The government has been growing its influence over decades and the people have learned to adapt. We accept the fact that our income is taxed before we get our paycheck. Often, what we buy with that paycheck is also taxed and the price of everything has some tax attached to it.
The government is also telling us what kind of insurance to have, what our kids can eat in school, how they can learn math and who gets to walk across the border into the country without consequences. It seems that we plan to adapt to these things as well.
This creeping social engineering, or socialism if you prefer, presents a new crisis where we can choose 1 out of 2 people and both of them will end up in a similar place. American democracy has been resistant to kind of rigged federal system, but the states now have less power than ever. Republicans will run one branch of the federal government and most of the states. One man at the top made it know ahead of time that all of that will have little effect.
While I would like to say that “vote Republican” is the solution, it is a stop-gap measure at best. Lawmakers find that consolidating power just makes things easier. Voters find that consolidated power eases the decision process. “Why vote if both candidates are the same? It’s not like they will take my right to vote away.”
We are at the point where your vote has almost no effect. Turning the other way on immigration will lead to work permits, which will lead to temporary status which will lead to citizenship. There will be a group of people who won’t vote much, but will be on call when the forces of consolidated government need to win an election. When will people stop adapting and revolt?
So, the Resider in Chief has decided that he will use “executive action,” whatever that means, to keep Illegal Aliens illegal, but look the other way, like the corrupt executive that he is. The details are relatively unimportant. First, he let in a bunch of illegal children. Next, he wants to make anchor baby parents free from legal action. He can’t technically grant citizenship, so he’s just going to make a mockery of the law instead.
He is guilty of what Bill Cosby is only accused of. Obama will do what he wants, knowing that the ramifications for his actions will be some time from now and much less than the temporary gain he gets now. By the time either the Supreme Court decides on this or the Republicans have any power in the Senate, the action will be implemented. The DNC will also get their influx of contributions, the real goal.
Obama only does anything for money. As bad as celebrities are, they only make $10 million by taking $10 at a time from movie goers. Obama can only see that kind of dough if he redirects trillions from the taxpayers. He changed his mind on gay marriage for campaign money. He blocks the Keystone pipeline for liberal environmentalist money. He needs to get some illegal immigration money (from big business) to have any leverage with the Democrats at this point. That pipeline vote was predetermined, but still pretty damn close. And now, we have illegal people in the country who can’t participate in citizenship, but can’t go home. I give it six months before the Overton Window gets pushed into “citizenship for the invisible people!”
I think this week gives us a good idea what will happen next year with a Democrat for a president, a majority in the House and Senate
Majority Minority Leader Harry Reid in charge filibustering.
First, there was the 59-41 vote on the Keystone pipeline. Unlike what the media tells you, they were never “one vote” short of passing. The Democrats decided which 14 Democrats needed to vote for the pipeline most to keep their seats in the future, with Landrieu at the top of the list. There was never even the possibility of a 15th Democrat. If things go as expected and Landrieu loses her race and Angus King doesn’t switch sides, the Republicans will have 54 seats. I bet that 8 of the 13 Democrats left in the pro-pipeline category will suddenly have a change of heart, keeping the number at 59.
Plus, Obama will be giving another historic speech where he will either threaten or perform executive edicts which will make crossing the border from Mexico about as legal as smoking marijuana at your gay wedding. Executive Orders cannot be struck down without contrary legislation, which won’t avoid veto, or through a court decision, which SCOTUS is loath to consider.
No affirmative legislation can make it to law when you have a Senate that can be filibustered and a president who will never be overridden. The only power the Republicans have is in the budgeting process. It is why the Democrats, liberals, progressives and media will scream loudest and most angrily about this tactic. Republicans will take damage. Their stock will drop in the polls. It is the expected outcome of unrelenting public attack. The Republicans already folded. I can only offer that once the impotent rage has been expressed, the negotiations will begin. And if foreign policy is any indication, the administration is terrible at negotiations.
So again, we are in the same place. The GOP can fight for real change or beg for spare change. Or they can wait for two years and use the worsening of America to get their guy in the White House. Sadly, I see the latter as their Plan A.
Sometimes you have to stick to the classics. Watch as Jonathan Gruber runs away to avoid saying the things he said freely when he thought none of the stupid people were watching.
So, to understand what Jonathan Gruber did, you have to understand the progressive mindset. Let’s look at one of Obamacare’s cheerleaders, Ethan “Pajama Boy” Krupp.
Krupp was featured in a number of embarrassing Obamacare ads for the OFA. After being identified in the much-mocked pajama meme, The Daily Caller discovered that he was a toxic warrior, or as he described it, “a liberal f***.” He describes the type as someone who is political, has a bunch of facts at his disposal, and argues to win while making the other person feel bad about themselves. I ran into this about a decade ago on, not surprisingly, a non-political chat room. He never wanted to impart knowledge, only throw in a factoid when I made an error. So, essentially it is hoarding information as if it were a commodity.
This is important, because Gruber knew all kinds of thing about what would happen given a set of circumstances. He knew what things would go “wrong” when the House passed the Senate bill with no changes. He also knew that hoarding this information was important. But like all megalomaniacs, he had to prove to his peers how much he was packing when he called the American people idiots.
The Krupps of the Progressive movement are the Tokyo Roses in this war of ideas. Last week, Fox Business host Melissa Francis told the story of being dragged in front of her bosses 4 years ago when she was at CNBC and questioned administration people and Obamacare supporters how adding people to the health care system could reduce costs. Apparently, she was showing disrespect to the office of the president, which was all clean and new now that Bush was gone.
The important part is the response of CNBC. Some spokesperson was actually allowed to say that her statement was not only laughable, but that NBC was looking for good comedy writers and actresses. This was likely a reference to Francis’ history as a child actor, ignoring her Harvard degree in Economics. One thing it was not, however, was a denial of what happened.
What a bunch of liberal f***s.
What did he know and when did he know it?
“The Emperor Has No Clothes” has been used as a metaphor since the beginning of the Obama administration. Obama says things that are complete crap, Congress passes laws that won’t work and the media accepts everything at face value, because many of the top media people are the family of top Democratic advisors.
Jonathan Gruber is not the boy who called out the nakedness of Obamacare, he’s the tailor who ripped off the Emperor (to the tune of about $5 million). Just to torture the metaphor a little more, the Democrats are trying to put the clothes back on the Emperor by claiming we all saw his business the whole time.
Here’s the problem. People like Gruber has his money. He’ll continue to be paid by Democrats who are already invested in Obamacare. He could also work for other governments trying to make socialized medicine work, even if it doesn’t. What happens to the politicians involved is another matter. New York’s Senator Gillibrand tried to use the junk insurance lie again to defend Gruber. She also fell into the trap of saying Obama should not have promised “you can keep your plan” as if it were a typo. I hope there’s no tape of her making the same claim in a town hall to a questioner.
Obama did not make that statement in a vacuum, however. This “period” statement with no qualifiers was needed to shore up support for the ACA before the vote. If he had not said this, people would be nervous and his detractors would have leverage. Obama’s skin in the game was lying for the sake of passing the law.
If you are on an Obamacare exchange, your options are Medicaid, where the government picks up the tab by pushing the cost onto the state, or a plan where you have to spend $15,000 in premiums and co-pays until your medical costs are significantly covered. That number is going up by about 10% this year under the same plan. Obamacare “covers” screenings and exams and astronomical medical bills. However, if you just get sick or hurt, you’ll be paying thousands of dollars.
Whoever knows enough of that picture (and would have if they read anything but talking points) and supported Obamacare is in big political trouble. The supposedly toxic act of Republicans “shutting down” the government was erased by a month of trouble signing up for Obamacare. Imagine what they could do to the president when people see this year’s bill.
Wow. This is the first time I can remember a post completely getting away from me. I guess you’ll have to settle for my mea culpa and the possibility I’ll have a real idea tomorrow.
Rep. Joe Wilson, who is still serving in the House of Representatives, is experiencing a revival for calling out “you lie” during a State of the Union address where President Obama made claims about the ACA which are less and less tied to reality every day. Jonathan Gruber, the man who made up the fake numbers to make Obamacare “revenue neutral,” on the other hand, is shown on video committing a number of Kinsley Gaffes. This is where you make a political mistake by telling the truth.
Gruber is basically incapable of talking to people with differing opinions. When confronted (in video number 6) with a comment by someone who was concerned about increasing medical costs, he asked if it was written by one of his children. Not surprisingly, he chose MSNBC to address his remarks. He claimed that he “spoke inappropriately.”
Whore Host Ronan Farrow helped out by calling what was done in the ACA bill “nuanced” in the way it made up numbers and was missing things that are now being implemented as if they were law. Gruber, in fact, never said he was sorry or even that he lied about his remarks. His excuse was that he was in an academic conference (in video 1) as if stupid people are not allowed to see such awesome intellectual majesty for fear they would not understand.
There are land mines coming in Obamacare over the next decade. The best solution for now is if the Supreme Court uses these falsehoods and the missing language from the ACA to start striking it down. Hopefully, Roberts isn’t as cowed by the administration now that it is in free fall.